This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Mayor Bloomberg’s comment about stop-and-frisk on his weekly radio show sparked major backlash from community leaders and politicians — the outrage stemming from hundreds of thousands of stops each year that result in arrests only about 10% of the time.

About 90% of those stopped are minority males.

Now Congressman Hakeem Jeffries is calling for a federal monitor to oversee the practice and the NYPD.
“The only way to restore order and respect for the constitution is for the justice department to step in as a court appointed federal monitor to protect the civil-rights of the Black and Latino community here in New York City,” Rep. Jeffries said.

Jeffries isn’t the first one to call for a federal monitor over stop-and-frisk.
Attorney General Eric Holder said he would support the oversight if a federal court judge finds the practice unconstitutional.

That trial wrapped up in May, but the judge gave no timetable for her ruling.

Even if the judge rules that stop-and-frisk is unconstitutional, Congressman Jeffries says without a federal monitor, Mayor Bloomberg and Commissioner Kelly would be in charge of enforcing a ban on the practice.  And Jeffries says, in light of the Mayor’s recent comments, clearly he’s not ready for that responsibility.

“It’s sad that we’ve reached a point where there’s no other place to turn than the federal government,” Jeffries said.

If the Department of Justice does appoint a federal monitor he or she would be able to enforce federal civil rights laws.

That’s a step up from an Inspector General position, recently approved by City Council, which will only be able to monitor the police department.