Bakery allowed to refuse cake for gay wedding

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

BAKERSFIELD, Calif. — A Kern County judge ruled in favor of a Bakersfield baker who refused to design a wedding cake for an already-married same-sex couple last year, CNN affiliate KERO reports.

Cathy Miller, owner of Tastries Bakery, was facing discrimination charges filed by the state.

Miller filed an opposition brief in January.

According to court documents from the ruling in favor of Tastries Bakery:

“A wedding cake is not just cake in Free Speech analysis. It is an artistic expression by the person
making it that is to be used traditionally as centerpiece in the celebration of marriage. There could
not be greater form of expressive conduct. Here… They plan celebration to declare the validity of their marital union and their enduring love for one another.

The State asks this court to compel Miller against her will and religion to allow her artistic expression in
celebration of marriage to be co-opted to promote the message desired by same-sex marital partners, and with which Miller disagrees.

Identifying the interests here as implicating First Amendment protections does not end the inquiry.

Furthermore, here the state minimizes the fact that Miller has provided for an alternative means for
potential customers to receive the product they desire through the services of another talent” — Miller recommended her competitor to the same-sex couple after refusing to design them a cake.

The ruling goes on to say that “the fact that Rodriguez-Del Rios feel they will suffer indignity from Miller’s choice is not sufficient to deny constitutional protection.”

Patricia Ziegler-Lopez, who is representing Mireya and Eileen Rodriguez-Del Rio in the case, gave 23 ABC the following statement:

“We are disappointed but not surprised by ruling against the preliminary injunction. Bakersfield and Kern County in general is very conservative and that unfortunately includes some of the judges. But it’s not over. Our fight against bigotry and discrimination is only beginning. I am going to speaking with the attorney that represents DFEH to plan the next step. To be clear this is no lawsuit filed yet.”

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.