Upper East Side restaurant fined $5K because of Craigslist ‘hostess’ ad

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

UPPER EAST SIDE, Manhattan (PIX11) -- Not for an instant did Lara Kineavy think a help wanted ad she posted on Craig’s List back in July, would land the restaurant she works for in hot water.

“I didn’t really think much about it. (I) just put an ad for hostess/coat check. That’s about it, “ said Kineavy.

“Hostess” was the word that caught the attention of the NYC Commission on Human Rights which monitors such ads.

The Italian restaurant Sistina, a popular Upper East Side staple for more than three decades, is accused of gender discrimination in its ad, and was slapped with a $5,000 fine.

“This is insane to accuse us of something, cause we don’t do that,” said Giuseppe Bruno, owner of Sistina. “At least give us a warning.”

In its complaint, the Commission said it had one of its own employees reply to the ad in two emails with attached resumes—one from a man, the other a woman. The Commission claimed only the woman’s email was opened, but on one specific day—August 22.

“Whether the male’s was opened on that day is in question. But it was 100 percent opened and reviewed,” said Kineavy, who works both as an assistant to the restaurant owner, and hostess.

She said the restaurant didn’t respond to either applicant, because neither was qualified.

The Commission on Human Rights released the following statement:

“In New York City, it is illegal under the Human Rights Law to express a preference for one protected class over another in an employment advertisement. In the Sistina case, Commissioner testers spotted an allegedly discriminatory ad that requested a specific gender to fill a position. The Commission filed a complaint and the case is currently under investigation. It is a normal practice for the Commission to try to settle cases at every stage of the process.”

Bruno vows to fight the fine.

“It was an honest mistake,” he said.



  • Michael

    Sorry, If I want a woman working for me, that is what I am going to hire. Customers are more comfortable with a pleasant FEMALE face. Just as when I go to the restaurant, I walk in and choose which area I sit in by watching the waiters and waitresses and which areas they have. Just another halfwit in the Human Rights commission who is bored and decided to try and justify their position by fining the restaurant.

    • Lindsey

      So if you had a customer who said they wanted a white waiter or didn’t feel comfortable being served by a Muslim, what would you do at that point? I bet there would be public outrage if the restaurant posted an ad saying “Looking waiters, no black people” or “Looking for Chinese cooks only”. Why is sexism more accepted in society than racism even though they are the same thing

  • Anastasia rose

    So what do we call “hostesses” now? Are they supposed to be “servers” ? Is that too sexist too? “Hostess” is a specific name gone generic. It means man or woman. It’s all symantics.
    You can’t base this fine on two applicants. It’s a 50/50 chance. You have to have 5 and 5 apply then see what happens.
    This was a stupid fine.

  • Lily

    I was browsing Craigslist yesterday. Why don’t they fine those people who put ads for “shapely cleaning girl” or “ebony waitress”? That definitely shows preference

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.