NEVER MISS A STORY: GET THE PIX11 NEWS APP FOR IMPORTANT UPDATES

Hillary Clinton takes on Benghazi critics in heated testimony

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Washington (CNN) — At times angry and choked with emotion, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Wednesday took on Republican critics of her department’s handling of the September terrorist attack in Libya that killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans, but repeatedly distanced herself from a direct role in specific situations.

“As I have said many times since September 11, I take responsibility,” Clinton told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at the first of two long-anticipated congressional hearings Wednesday on the attack that became a major issue in the November presidential election.

Conservative Republicans challenged Clinton on the lack of security at the diplomatic compound in Benghazi, where Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others were killed, as well as the erroneous account given days later by U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice that the attack grew spontaneously from a protest over an anti-Islam film produced in the United States.

Sen. Ron Johnson, a tea party backed Wisconsin Republican serving his first term, persistently questioned Clinton about he called Rice’s “purposely misleading” the American people. In response, Clinton shouted in exasperation that with four Americans dead and the focus now on preventing future security breakdowns, “what difference, at this point, does it make?”

She acknowledged the “systemic breakdown” cited by an Accountability Review Board she appointed and noted she had accepted all 29 of its recommendations, adding her department was taking additional steps to increase security at U.S. diplomatic facilities around the world.

However, Clinton also told the committee she had no direct role in requests by Stevens and other diplomats for increased security in Benghazi and elsewhere, saying: “I didn’t see those requests. They didn’t come to me.”

Another conservative Republican, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, told Clinton she should have been fired her for not reading cables from Stevens and others in Libya.

The independent report from the review board said it did not find “that any individual U.S. government employee engaged in misconduct or willfully ignored his or her responsibilities” leading up to the attack. However, one State Department official resigned and three others were placed on administrative leave after the report was released in December.

clinton

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Wednesday took on Republican critics of her department’s handling of the September terrorist attack in Libya that killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.

Later at Wednesday’s hearing, in reference to the erroneous talking points by Rice that were aired on September 16, Clinton said she was focused at that time on ensuring the safety of U.S. personnel at other facilities where protests were taking place.

“I was pretty occupied about keeping our people safe, doing what needed to be done,” Clinton said, adding “I wasn’t involved in the talking points process.”

In her opening statement, Clinton said the Benghazi attack didn’t happen in a vacuum but was part of a “broader strategic challenge in North Africa and the wider region.”

2 comments

  • Tom Barense

    Biggest cover-up since Watergate. We have got to get to the bottom of this. Who gave Susan Rice the talking points which she mislead the American people with? This issue cannot be swept under the rug.

  • Chuck

    WHAT A bunch of bull s___!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You are the biggest liar on this planet!!!!!

Comments are closed.